Categories
PHI 445 Week 5 Final Project Argumentative Essay (GMOs: Monsanto)
$9.00

PHI 445 Week 5 Final Project Argumentative Essay (GMOs: Monsanto)

This Tutorial was purchased 4 times & rated B+ by student like you.

 

This Tutorial contains following Attachments

  • PHI 445 N Week 5 Final Project A Essay (GMOs Monsanto).docx

In the Week Three Assignment, you engaged in a case analysis of a current business problem using some of the components of an argumentative essay. In this written assignment, you will write a complete argumentative essay as described in Sections 9.1 and 9.2 of With Good Reason: A Guide to Critical Thinking(Foster, Hardy, &Zúñiga y Postigo, 2015). This essay will include a revised and polished version of your Week Three Assignment, an objection to your thesis, a rebuttal, and concluding remarks. In order to benefit the most, you should start working on your Final Project from the time you receive your Week Three Assignment back with comments from your professor. Your assignment should include the following: A revision of your Week Three Case Analysis Assignment. Your revision should represent a substantial edit of your work that fully incorporates feedback from your professor and goes well beyond correcting any grammatical or APA errors. The strongest possible objection to your thesis. After the final paragraph of your Week Three Case Analysis Assignment, start a new paragraph that introduces the strongest possible objection to your thesis. The considerations for this are detailed in Section 9.2 of With Good Reason: A Guide to Critical Thinking (Hardy, Foster, &Zúñiga y Postigo, 2015). Make sure to employ the appropriate language to introduce the objection, such as “some may object to my thesis as follows” or “according to [so and so] the thesis presented here fails to account for X” [whatever he or she finds problematic]. You can find other language to do this, of course, but the key point here is to make sure that you indicate that someone else is speaking when presenting this objection. It is also important to remember that you do research to discover good objections and not merely objections that are weak and thus easily rebutted. Look for peer-reviewed journal articles in the Ashford University Library, full- text articles in Google Scholar, or articles in the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Present the opposing position fairly and in detail. This may take more than one paragraph. A rebuttal. This is a refutation of the objection that you have just presented. Start this in a new paragraph following the objection paragraph(s). Once again, follow the indications of Section 9.2 of With Good Reason: A Guide to Critical Thinking (Hardy, Foster, &Zúñiga y Postigo, 2015). You may point out an error in the objection. Or you may show that, while it is an important objection, it does not apply squarely to your argument, or does not account for facts that make it irrelevant. Above all, make sure to maintain philosophical decorum in your rebuttal. Toward this end, you should apply the principles of charity and of accuracy, first introduced in the Week One course material. See “Confronting Disagreement” in Section 9.4 ofWith Good Reason: A Guide to Critical Thinking (Hardy, Foster, &Zúñiga y Postigo, 2015). Closing remarks. End your argumentative essay with a paragraph of closing remarks. Provide some reflections of what you have attempted to achieve by means of your essay. You could, for example, explain how your essay sheds light on the broader controversy that it addresses. Or you could point out how your essay addresses a frequently ignored point or the unpopular side in the controversy. You could also reflect on the related matters in the broader controversy that would be useful to examine by others. Do not merely summarize what you have done in the body of your essay, and do not add new information here that would support or contradict your essay since the body of your essay should have addressed all the relevant points. See “Closing Your Essay” in Section 9.2 of With Good Reason: A Guide to Critical Thinking (Hardy, Foster, &Zúñiga y Postigo (2015). Requirements for your Assignment: • Your assignment should be between 1500 to 1700 words in length, excluding the cover and references pages. • Your examination should be both thorough and succinct. This is a combination that demands time and thought, so give yourself sufficient time to draft and revise. • Your assignment should include citations, as well as a list of references. Both must be in APA form. • Your references should include at least four peer-reviewed articles in addition to those that you will be carrying over from our Week Three Case Analysis Assignment. These references should be drawn from the Ashford University Library, Google Scholar, or the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. • Your assignment should be submitted no later than the end of Monday (midnight, U.S. Mountain time).

Write a review

Order Id


Order Id will be kept Confidential
Your Name:


Your Review:
Rating:   A   B   C   D   F  

Enter the code in the box below:



Related Tutorials
$35.00

This Tutorial was purchased 13 times & rated A+ by student like you.

This Tutorial contains 3 Paper of Week 3 Assignment, Week 5 Assignment, 3 Set of Week 1,2 Quiz, 2 Response to each DQ PHI 445 Week 1 Quiz (3 Sets) PHI 445 Week 1 Discussion Utilitarianism, Deontology, and Virtue Ethics Case Study: Starbucks PHI 445 Week 2 Discussion Capitalism and Socialism Cas..
$5.00

This Tutorial was purchased 3 times & rated No rating by student like you.

PHI 445 Week 1 Discussion Utilitarianism, Deontology, and Virtue Ethics: Case Study: Starbucks Prepare: The initial post in this discussion must be informed by the required material for this discussion. Your preparation should focus on three classical ethical theories that are fundamental in any et..
$5.00

This Tutorial was purchased 16 times & rated B+ by student like you.

PHI 445 Week 2 Discussion Capitalism and Socialism Case Study: Uber Prepare: Your initial post in this discussion must be informed by the required material for this discussion. The required material for this discussion will introduce you to what is new about Uber as a business model, the profit inc..
$5.00

This Tutorial was purchased 1 times & rated No rating by student like you.

PHI 445 Week 5 Discussion Discrimination Laws: Advantages and Disadvantages for both Employees and Business Case Study: Abercrombie & Fitch Prepare: In your first post in this discussion, you will become familiar with the case of Abercrombie & Fitch by means of the relevant material in the Required..
$5.00

This Tutorial was purchased 5 times & rated No rating by student like you.

PHI 445 Week 4 Discussion The Effects of Business on Consumers and the Environment: Case Study: Perdue Farms Prepare: In preparation for your first post in this discussion, you will become familiar with the case of Perdue Farms by means of the material listed under Required Resources (Generally). Y..
$5.00

This Tutorial was purchased 5 times & rated No rating by student like you.

This Tutorial contains 3 Responses British Petroleum, Goodyear, Perdue Farms PHI 445 Week 3 Discussion Currrent Business Problems: Case Studies: Lehman Brothers, British Petroleum, Monsanto, Merck, Goodyear, Perdue Farms Prepare: In your first post in this discussion, you will identify and app..
$7.00

This Tutorial was purchased 11 times & rated A+ by student like you.

PHI 445 Week 3 Assignment Case Analysis: Case Studies: Lehman Brothers, British Petroleum, Monsanto, Merck, Goodyear, Perdue Farms In the Week Three Discussion, you selected a current business problem from the following case categories: • Banking • Fuel and the Environment • GMOs • Factory Farm..
$9.00

This Tutorial was purchased 12 times & rated A+ by student like you.

In the Week Three Assignment, you engaged in a case analysis of a current business problem using some of the components of an argumentative essay. In this written assignment, you will write a complete argumentative essay as described in Sections 9.1 and 9.2 of With Good Reason: A Guide to Critical T..
$7.00

This Tutorial was purchased 8 times & rated A+ by student like you.

PHI 445 Week 3 Assignment Case Analysis: Case Studies: Lehman Brothers, British Petroleum, Monsanto, Merck, Goodyear, Perdue Farms In the Week Three Discussion, you selected a current business problem from the following case categories: • Banking • Fuel and the Environment • GMOs • Factory Farm..
$9.00

This Tutorial was purchased 11 times & rated B+ by student like you.

In the Week Three Assignment, you engaged in a case analysis of a current business problem using some of the components of an argumentative essay. In this written assignment, you will write a complete argumentative essay as described in Sections 9.1 and 9.2 of With Good Reason: A Guide to Critical T..
$7.00

This Tutorial was purchased 2 times & rated B+ by student like you.

PHI 445 Week 3 Assignment Case Analysis: Case Studies: Lehman Brothers, British Petroleum, Monsanto, Merck, Goodyear, Perdue Farms In the Week Three Discussion, you selected a current business problem from the following case categories: • Banking • Fuel and the Environment • GMOs • Factory Farm..
$7.00

This Tutorial was purchased 2 times & rated A+ by student like you.

PHI 445 Week 1 Quiz (3 Set) 1 1. Question : Which of these statements about moral values is true? 2. Question : When a pharmaceutical company releases a new drug with known side effects that will help more people than the side effects will harm, this is an example of what type of ethics? 3...
$7.00

This Tutorial was purchased 4 times & rated A+ by student like you.

PHI 445 Week 2 Quiz (3 Set) 1 1. Question : In 2007, a defense contractor was found guilty for working with a co-conspirator to submit bids with increased prices for a bulletproof vest contract so that a particular company would win the contract at a lower price. This is an example of 2. Qu..
PHI 445 © 2019 All Rights Reserved.Powered by:Ash Tutorial